CHAMPIONSHIP OF RUSSIA. Premier League . 9th round .
The results of Saturday’s game day Premiership specifically for the “SE” summed up the former defender of “Spartacus”, a three-time champion of Russia.
-” Spartacus “greatly disappointed?
– Not without it. But fresh in the memory of all the matches of the team this season, and not in each game was quality. Somewhere rescued mastery of individual players, somewhere, quite frankly, was lucky. And the judge at the start of the championship as a whole were quite loyal to Spartak. Last week, the team has already alarmed – rival, “growth”, controlled what was happening on the field, a total of 70 minutes, no less. Then we managed to defend the desired result. At this same time from the beginning went wrong.
– What do you expect from “Spartacus” in Krasnodar?
– Let’s say, what not to expect – zero attacking efficiency. I saw the game “Kuban” in the previous rounds and constantly caught myself thinking: how many have problems in defense Krasnodar! Now “Spartacus” is a group of creators high by our standards level, goes against this team – and could not score even once … Yes, some moments at the gates Belenova occurred, but say that the guests were close to the goal, has a serious pressure, and even more dominated, in any case impossible. The game led “Kuban”, and its success is quite natural.
– At the break the guests were leaving, losing 0: 2, but the front was still the whole time. This match could try to save?
– In principle, yes. Only in the second half, I did not see any radical changes in the pattern of the game. Yes, from time to time Spartacus tried to activate, but I would not say that they have succeeded in injecting the severity of the gate owners. There is an iron rule: to whom more is necessary, and he has to do more. Invent, invent, create, implement. Is football “Spartacus” after the break posted this rule? ..
On the contrary, in the realm of Rebrov and then blazing fire. Krasnodar scored three times, and could chop and half a dozen goals – if productive disposed of possibilities, most of them, by the way, has generously provided himself “Spartacus”.
– Why is this happening? Advocates hard enough?
– Mess – but to protect the “Spartacus” throughout the match, and he was seen – rarely occurs on someone’s personal fault. Because the team plays, and if one makes a mistake, his obligation to insure others. But Krasnodar with alarming regularity penetrated the shock position – and broke through on the right and left, and center. So I would not write off all to the personal mistakes of specific defenders. In my opinion, there climbed out shortcomings in the organization of the game team as a whole. Have you noticed how many fielders “Spartacus” is in his own penalty area, when the hosts opened the scoring?
– I remember them there were many.
– Well, I’ll tell you for sure: there they were nine. Nine! But there was no one who could use Hubulovu movement from his vantage point. No one really even moved him – even though it was clear that the man came for a discount or a ricochet. Why not take it more tightly? For me it is a mystery … But it happened at the very beginning of the match. Nobody ever would collapse from exhaustion enough to lose concentration at all – everyone was cheerful and fresh.
– Speaking of freshness – perhaps the state of Spartak had a negative impact of absence in the national team?
– If we were discussing the match against “Rostov”, this version still would have had a right to exist – they say, gave it in full, plus flights … But “Kuban”, then the team was preparing in the full weekly cycle! There were, I think, training, tactical training, mindset – that’s just the main was not: the game. No, I would understand, lost “Spartacus” 2: 3 or 3: 4 – it happens when a team-oriented attack, underestimate the possible contenders: the game itself too much to allow him to. Here Muscovites and do not really played, and the hosts allowed to frolic in front.
– Spartak leaders have not shown themselves?
– Of course, they can and must play stronger. The same broad and Popov, for example. Much is expected from them in terms of creation, but it was not their day.
– Shirokov 90 minutes wrapped more than 11 km …
– you were given those runs! (laughs) . I wonder how our television counts such statistics?
– There are special computer programs.
– I understand. I have another clue why, when I see the same kind of statistics in Europe’s leading championships, it often looks more modest? At that speed, the pace, the intensity of the game in Germany or England is not like ours. This sometimes causes a smile. Yes and no deal in kilometers, and in the amount of useful work. If it is at least something to say by and large about. Shirokov, if you talk specifically about it, trying to continue to look sharp, but the search was in vain. Almost none of the planned could not be realized. And Popov do not have enough power for the entire match, if before the break, he was active in the second half disappeared.
– Whether to spearhead” Spartacus “Movsisyan, the owners would have more difficult?
– Probably yes, although in this case we are talking about abstract things, and game-specific. Overall Movsisyan more punch and speed than Ze Luis. Jura loves to play on the edge of offside – and such a manner, may have helped to push the line of defense, “Kuban” deeper, and thus, to some extent forge actions across Krasnodar team. Movsisyan can charge on goal from any distance, is good in the game of separation, at a distance. But all this is under the condition that he is healthy and in good shape.
– After a long break for “Spartacus” played Ezbilis. How does he show you?
– I liked its focus on the gate, the passion with which he broke into the game. It was clear that people long for a serious practice at the club. And speeds, and open, and the ball hit … But in order to turn the game, his efforts were, of course, is not enough. And he came closer to the end of the match. By and large, this change – the only one of the three made by Muscovites, who strengthened their game. Two others – mean output Makeyev and Krotov – not justified.
– Head coach “Kuban” Sergei Tasha took the team just three days before the match. How active he could affect the state of the team, which, in fact, hardly had time to get to know?
– Large-scale changes in a short time it is impossible to make. I’m talking about the physical condition of players, an operating time of some fundamentally new tactical options. But you can shake up the team, more correct psychology – in other words, to make children believe in themselves, to light them. Judging by the result, and by the pressure, with which the game “Kuban”, the three days Tasha held on the basis not in vain.
– Is it possible to continue in the same spirit?
– is difficult to say … It is necessary to realize that against the “Spartacus” Krasnodar worked at maximum capacity – physical, emotional, tactical and technical. Continuing to issue such outbursts is very difficult. The novelty effect – a short-term thing. But the positive is very important, it can serve as the impetus for a long-term positive changes in the game. And yet, without detracting from the merits of the home, as I said: “Spartacus” in this match it was not like a team ready to solve serious problems.
– In the day game, “Terek” outright defeated “Ufa”, won a second victory in a row. Grozny has finally burst?
– I’m not surprised victories, “Terek”. I was rather puzzled by the fact that they took so long to come to this team. Its potential is very high: a good squad, the coach seriously … And the club of indifference does not reproach. The core of the team remains unchanged for two and a half to three years, and it also gives the “Terek” a definite advantage over the competition. They have traditionally been used to successfully play on your field – and then, finally, won in his native walls in the new season. I think in the next rounds will rise further in the table.
No comments:
Post a Comment