The project appeals on parliamentary investigation of Anatoly Serdyukov as defense minister failed to win on Wednesday in the State Duma, the necessary support of parliamentarians. The initiators of the investigation, which were members of the Communist Party, were just 27 votes. Together with them, we voted for the project in the “Fair Russia” and the Liberal Democratic Party, but the outcome of the ruling party has identified – “United Russia”. Her deputy in bulk just did not participate in the vote.
This is the second unsuccessful attempt to start the procedure of the Duma opposition parliamentary investigation against Serdyukov. The first time the MPs tried to do it in December 2013, but then the “United Russia” has refused to support them under the pretext that against former high-ranking official has initiated a criminal case. After the case was closed in 2014, and he was amnestied Serdyukov as the Hero of Russia, the Communists decided to once again try his luck, and in December made a new project on the treatment of early parliamentary investigation.
However, in January 2015 he had given a negative opinion of the Duma profile committee on State Building. To the same document and all of the State Duma did six months later – just after it ended the proceedings against the main supernumerary “business” Oboronservis “Yevgenia Vasilyeva.
” The court sentenced the ‘Amazons Serdyukov “to real terms but to put an end to this process early. And it’s not that Vassiliev could get out on parole (parole) a month, and not even the fact that she was sitting in a luxury prison with a hairdresser and pizza delivery. A that the pogrom of the Armed Forces by Serdyukov and his “Amazons” should be given a clear assessment, including in terms of damage, “- explained the need for a parliamentary investigation into one of its initiators, the Communist Valery Rashkin.
The reason for the investigation appear to handle the “facts of gross violation of the ex-minister of defense of financial discipline, expressed in inefficient spending of the federal budget, and unlawful possession of federal property.” Communists counted nine such episodes that received media attention. Among them – the transfer of land for construction in Anapa elite residential building; sales base for refueling ships of the Northern Fleet; illegal delivery of the Defense Ministry for rent forest land in the Bryansk region for mining; Construction for the state account of the road to the recreation center, “Rye”, etc.
“Ex-Ministers planted everywhere – both in the EU and the CIS, and the sky does not fall on the ground,” – said Rashkin. For example, he referred to Greece, where in 2013 the former head of the military department, together with his wife and daughter were sentenced to 20 years in prison. “But Serdyukov amnestied, running and even travels with flashing lights” – Outraged MP.
Communists supported in the “Fair Russia” and the Liberal Democratic Party. “We want to know whether the abuse or not, because the number of episodes before the trial has not yet been reached. We are not going to judge: Serdyukov is guilty or not – this court will decide. But we have to say that everyone is equal before the law”, – called on the Liberal Democrat Sergey Ivanov.
However, the head of the Duma profile committee on state construction Vladimir Pligina turned out another opinion. “Subject to a parliamentary investigation is not present. In 12 episodes already made a decision, and another 35 investigation continues,” – said the deputy. His colleagues in the “United Russia” and all suspected opposition members in an attempt to intervene in the investigation and trial. “This is illegal,” – United Russia Dmitry Vyatkin cut.
Half an hour deputies argued, finding fault with the wording in the text of the appeal. Piligin insisted that the initiators of the project want to investigate it sounded episodes of Serdyukov’s working life, and thereby substitute inspectors, and the Communists argued that it is only “illustration outrages that were happening in the Defense Ministry.” Because of the appeal, it follows that the main objectives of the parliamentary investigation must be “identifying the causes and conditions conducive to the gross violations of financial discipline in the Defence Ministry, informing them of society, as well as assisting in the removal of the causes and conditions”.
“The presence or termination of a criminal case can not be an obstacle to a parliamentary investigation,” – said the former prosecutor, Yuri Communist Sinel’shchikov. According to him, the Duma at the time held 11 investigations, and they went along with the preliminary investigation.
But Piligin called such talk “not serious” and hinted that in place of the authors have prepared a new project in which clearly defined “subject”. But the third attempt, most likely, will not be.
Elena Zemskova
No comments:
Post a Comment